RAVINDRA KUMAR DUBEY v. SURYA NARAIN TIWARI and OTHERS
A227/10074/2021 · 2025-05-14
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153536 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153536 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28274 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 10074 of 2021 Petitioner :- Ravindra Kumar Dubey Respondent :- Surya Narain Tiwari And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shitla Prasad Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- Anil Kumar Mishra,Anand Prakash Pandey,Rang Nath Misra Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Anil Kumar Mishra and Anand Prakash Pandey, learned Counsel for the respondents.
2. The present petition has been filed challenging an order dated 25.10.2017 whereby, the amendment application was rejected as well as the order dated 10.01.2021, whereby the revision filed against the said order was also rejected.
3. Considering the nature of the order, wherein, the amendment application was rejected mainly on the ground that the same was being filed based upon a commission, which was opposed by the petitioner and was set aside.
4. I do not see any reason to interfere at this stage. The writ petition is dismissed.
5. However, the petitioner is at liberty to take additional ground after the suit is finally decided and the appeal is preferred, if so advised. Order Date :- 14.5.2025 akverma Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench