HARIOM GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 7 OTHERS
WRIC/7107/2025 · 2025-07-30
Jaspreet Singh, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153527 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153527 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44176-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7107 of 2025 Petitioner :- Hariom Gupta Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Lko. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sachichida Nand Shukla,Jitendra Kumar Upadhyaya,Rakesh Kumar Mishra,Shivam Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
1. Heard.
2. The petitioner seeks his share of the ancestral house.
3. A writ petition is not the appropriate remedy. He may pursue the remedy prescribed in law, subject to the locus standi and cause of action.
4. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (Jaspreet Singh, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 30.7.2025 Shubhankar Digitally signed by :- SHUBHANKAR THAKUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench