Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 153472 (ALL)

SMT. SURYA MUKHI v. SHRI RAJENDRA PRASAD APAR MUKHYA ADHIKARI ZILA PANCHAYAT RAEBARELI

CAPL/2290/2025 · 2025-08-28

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2290 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. The respondent has filed compliance affidavit, which is taken on record. Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the payment has been made to the applicant and the representation of the applicant has been decided, hence the present contempt application has become infructuous. On the other hand, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that though the payment has been made and the representation has been decided in compliance of the judgment and order passed by the writ Court but the interest has not been paid otherwise for all practical purposes, the present contempt application has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous but liberty may be given to the applicant to avail the remedy for the purpose of payment of interest on delayed payment. In view of above, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. It is always open for the applicant to avail the remedy as may be permissible under law. Notice if any, stands discharged. August 28, 2025 Nitesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Udai Bhan Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Manish Kumar,J.) Smt. Surya Mukhi .....Applicant(s) Shri Rajendra Prasad Apar Mukhya Adhikari Zila Panchayat Raebareli .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench