T.Bhanumathi v. Asst. Provident Fund Commissioner,
WA/912/2014 · 2025-07-13
Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15347 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15347 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010195902014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESFT ATAMARAVATI MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE •s •. PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, THE CHIEF JUSTICE^ AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATl WRIT APPEAL NO: 912 OF 2014 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent filed against order dated 12-08-2010 in W.P.No.25350 of 2002 Between: T. Bhanumathi. W/o T. Ramalinga Reddy, Proprietrix, Visakha Milk Base, aged 51 years, Occ: Business, r/o 26-23-16, 2"^ Floor, N.H.5, Chaitnayanagar, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam ...Petitioner AND
1. Asst Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Sub Regional Office, VUDA Layout, Visakhapatnam.
2. The Andhra Pradesh Coop Bank Ltd, Troop Bazar, P.B.No.142, Hyderabad, rep. by its Manager/ Sale Officer ...Respondents lA NO: 1 OF 2014fWAMP 1892 OF 2014^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings of the orders issued by the 1st respondent in his
. 0 proceedings No. API 31601/PD/APA/P/CC.5/2036, dated 12.11.2002. pending the writ appeal. Counsel for the Petitioner: K PURUSHOTHAM Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI T BALAJI (SC FOR EPFp) Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI A H RAMA KRISHNA RAO (3C FOR APCOB) The Court made the following order:
w APHC010195902014 Bench Sr.No:-5 [3483] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 912 of 2014 ...Appellant T. Bhanumathi Vs. ...Respondents Asst Provident Fund Commissioner and another ********** Advocate for Appellant: Advocate(s) for Respondent(s): NONE Mr. T Balaji (SC for EPFO) for R.1
CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 14th July 2025 PC : None for the appellant. Even on the previous date of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. The Writ Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution. No
order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- M.RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, One CC to SRI K PURUSHOTHAM Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI T BALAJI(SC FOR EPFO) Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI A H RAMA KRISHNA RAO (SC FOR APCOB) - Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies GSG
1.
2.
3.
4. X
HIGH COURT *> DATED: 14/07/2025 ^OFANbS;^ I 0 5 AlJfi 20?5 Sj Cgrrent iieciion .'pf
ORDER WANO. 912 OF 2014 DISMISSING THE WA FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS