Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15345 (JHR)

LALAN RAY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/496/2024 · 2025-01-17

Sujit Narayan Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Cvl.) No. 496 of 2024 --------------- Lalan Ray, aged about 46 years, s/o late Kalu Ray, R/o Village- Sarguja, PO-Bhaga, PS-Jorapokhar, District-Dhanbad ........Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sri Samiran Datta, the Chairman cum Managing Director, BCCL, having office at Koyla Bhawan, PO & PS-Saraidhela, District- Dhanbad 3. Sri J.K. Singh, Chief General Manager, Kustor Area, BCCL, having office at PO & PS-Kustor, District-Dhanbad 4. Sri Jagdish Karamkar, the Deputy Chief Personnel Manager cum Deputy Personnel Manager (Administration), Kustor Area, BCCL, having office at PO & PS-Kustor, District-Dhanbad 5. Sri Mahindra Singh Doot, General Manager cum Assistant General Manager, Kustor Area, BCL, having office at PO & PS-Kustor, District-Dhanbad 6. Sri Rajeev Kumar Mishra, the Project Officer, Kustor Area, BCCL, having office at PO & PS-Kustor, District-Dhanbad ...... Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD For the Petitioner : Md. Faiyaj Alam, Advocate For the OPs : Mr. Anoop Kumar Mehta, Advocate Order No.5/Dated: 17th January, 2025 Md. Faiyaj Alam, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, at the outset has submitted that the order of this Court has been complied with and, as such, he does not want to proceed further with the present contempt case. 2. Mr. Anoop Kumar Mehta, the learned counsel appearing for the contemnor-BCCL based upon the averments made in the show-cause has submitted that the order of this Court has been complied with. 3. Considering the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Contempt Case is closed and disposed of, as such. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) Sudhir