Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15341 (JHR)

ROHIT SINGH ALIAS ROHIT KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4788/2025 · 2025-06-18

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:16020] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4788 of 2025 ------ Rohit Singh @ Rohit Kumar Singh, S/O- Jaleshwar Singh, Age about 19 years, R/O- PHED Road, Singh Tola, Rukka, P.O- Irba, P.S- Ormanjhi, District- Ranchi. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Santosh Kr. Jha, Advocate Mr. Peeyush Krishna, Advocate Mr. Amrit Anunay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Prasad, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-18-06-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Ormanjhi P.S. Case No.47 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 331(4), 305 of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused persons was involved in commission of theft and articles used in the business of catering and three pieces of aluminum channel has been recovered from the possession of the co-accused. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 28.03.2025 as is evident from para-1 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-9 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 02.05.2025 passed in B.A. No.3511 of 2025. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned JM, Ranchi in connection with Ormanjhi P.S. Case No.47 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/