DINESH VISHWAKARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE DISTT. MAGISTRATE SULTANPUR AND 7 OTHERS
WRIC/6990/2025 · 2025-07-25
Manish Kumar, Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153407 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153407 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:42883-DB Court No. - 11 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6990 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dinesh Vishwakarma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. The Distt. Magistrate Sultanpur And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar,Kajal Soni,Vinod Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard. The present writ petition has been preferred with the following prayer:-
"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS thereby commanding the Opp. Parties No. 1 to 4 to restrain the Opp. Party No. 5 to 8 not to create any hindrance in peaceful construction of house over the land area 0.013 hec, out of land Gata No. 132 situated at village Kandraul, police Station Kadipur, District Sultanpur which is abadi land and got through patta." Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the present writ petition as the relief sought is against the private opposite parties, which cannot be entertained under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as may be permissible under law. In view of above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as may be permissible under law. [Manish Kumar, J.] [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J] Order Date :- 25.7.2025 Nitesh Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench