Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1534 (UTT)

ANUP RAWAT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

CRLR/42/2025 · 2025-07-17

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS CRLR No.42 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Kamlesh Budhlakoti, Advocate for the revisionist. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. with Mr. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the criminal revision has rendered infructuous. 4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the revisionist, the criminal revision is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 17.07.2025 SK