1 APHC010196022012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 38799/2012 Between: 1. NAGARURU RAJASEKHAR, S/O MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC: EMPLOYEE, R/O MIG. 1/438, HOUSING BOARD COLONY, YEMMIGANUR ROAD, ADONI POST, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (RETAIL) MARKETING HEADQSUARTERS REGD. OFFICE,:G-9, ALL YAVAR JUNG MARG, BANDRA (EAST) MUMBAI- 400 051. 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER, A.P. STATE OFFICE, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION, D.NO. 3-6-436 TO 438, 1ST AND 2ND FLOOR, NASPUR HOUSE, HIMAYATHNAGAR HYDERABAD. 3. THE DIVISIONAL RETAIL SALES MANAGER, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, DIVISIONAL OFFICE D.NO. 8-115/1, 1ST FLOOR, M.M.COMPLEX, R.C. ROAD, RAYAL NAGAR, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. K KRISHNA MOHAN, S/O VENKATARAMPPA, AGED 44 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O MARLAMADIKI VILLAGE AND POST, HOLAGUNDI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B NAGI REDDY 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SAI SANJAY SURANENI 2. SUDHENDER KULKARNI The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: No representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioner. 2. Ms. A. Priyanka, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Sai Sanjay Suraneni, learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 is present. 3. Ms. A. Priyanka, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Sai Sanjay Suraneni, learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Senior Manager (RS)/TDO dated 21.07.2025. Copy of it is not supplied to the Counsel for the Writ Petitioner since there is no representation on behalf of the Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 4. Learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 has drawn the attention of this Court to the Interim Order granted by this Court on 18.12.2012 directing the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 not to issue letter of intent to Respondent No.4 in respect of Kisan Seva Kendra retail outlet dealership. 5. The Written Instruction would indicate that by virtue of the Interim Order dated 18.12.2012, retail outlet dealership has not been granted to Respondent No.4 and that, presently, the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are not keen in establishing an outlet in the subject area as it is the opinion of the Respondents that it is not viable. 6. In view of the Written Instruction, this Court is of the opinion that this Writ Petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 3 7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 21.07.2025 Vns 4