AASHIK KUMAR @ AASHIK S/O UDAIRAJ v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/5052/2025 · 2025-07-03
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15338 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15338 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:24530] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5052/2025 Aashik Kumar @ Aashik S/o Udairaj, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Meena Badauda Police Station Vajeerpur, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Karauli). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Fateh Ram Meena For State For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, P.P. Ms. Pankaj Solanki on behalf of Mr. Arvind Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 03/07/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.468/2023 registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Karauli for the offences under Sections 365 & 384 of IPC.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing for the complainant and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that for the alleged allegations of abduction, victim Ankit as well as lodger of the F.I.R., who is the grand-father of victim, a compromise with the present petitioner has been entered on 16.06.2025, wherein it is mentioned that if the bail application is
[2025:RJ-JP:24530] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5052/2025] allowed, then the complainant side has no objection to the same. Petitioner is behind the bars since 12.03.2025 and charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the complainant has also consented to the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and has also made a statement that parties have amicably settled their dispute and complainant has no objection to the same.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Aashik Kumar @ Aashik shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J AMIT/113