DR. ALOK KUMAR SHUKLA AND 8 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. MEDICAL HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE LKO. AND ANOTHER
WRIA/8060/2025 · 2025-07-24
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153355 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153355 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:42535 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8060 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dr. Alok Kumar Shukla And 8 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Medical Health And Family Welfare Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Saurabh Tiwari,Amit Prakash Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers:
"(a) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite parties to promote the petitioners on the post of Medical Officer Level-2 in pay scale of Rs.15600-39100 grade pay Rs.6600.00 from the date they have completed the required period of service as per 2021 PMS Service Rules for promotion from Level-1 to Level-2 with all consequential service benefits contained as Annexure No. 5 in the interest of justice. (b) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite parties to grant the DACP to the petitioners with effect from due date on which the junior from the petitioners were appointed and given all consequential benefits according to Government Order dated 26.02.2015. "
3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that similar dispute has already been adjudicated upon by this Court in Writ A No. 9545 of 2024 (Dr. Priya Srivastava Versus State of U.P. and others) vide judgment and
order dated 21.10.2024.
4. Since consideration of petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspect, liberty is granted to file fresh individual representation before respondent no. 2 i.e., Director General Medical and Health Services, Uttar Pradesh, Swasthya Bhawan, Lucknow, who shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously within a period eight weeks
from the date of receipt of such representation in the light of the
judgment rendered in the case of Dr. Priya Srivastava (Supra) in case the same is applicable in the present case also. The petitioners shall annex the copy of the aforesaid judgment along with their representation.
5. With the aforesaid observations/directions, petition stands
disposed of.
Order Date :- 24.7.2025 Arun Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench