KITABUL NISHA v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, JUDICIAL, AYODHYA AND 8 OTHERS
A227/4382/2025 · 2025-07-25
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153324 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153324 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43115 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4382 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kitabul Nisha Respondent :- Additional Commissioner, Judicial, Ayodhya And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Asad Mahmood,Shujat Kidwai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Sri Mohammad Asad Mahmood, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
2. In light of the proposed order, notices to private respondents are dispensed with.
3. It has been submitted that proceedings U/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 were initiated before the Naib Tehsildar by father of the petitioner in which on 03.12.2024 inspection report directed for cancellation of the names of petitioner and respondent No. 7 from Gata No. 329, 235, 472, 491, 530 and
534.
4. In the aforesaid circumstances, the petitioner had preferred a revision before the Additional Commissioner in Case No. 380/2025 where the operation of the order dated 03.12.2024 has been stayed. It has been stated that despite interim order having been passed by Additional Commissioner, the private respondents are creating interference in the possession of the petitioner and it is in the aforesaid circumstances a prayer has been made for a direction to respondent Nos. 2 & 3 to comply with the order of Additional Commissioner, Ayodhya dated
21.02.2025.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has opposed the writ petition and has submitted that petitioner has efficacious remedy of filing an application U/S 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual for complying with the orders passed by revenue authorities.
6. At this stage, learned counsel for petitioner submits that he does not want to press the writ petition and seeks liberty to move appropriate application U/S 460 of U.P. Revenue Court
Manual for direction to comply with the direction of Additional commissioner, Ayodhya dated 21.02.2025.
7. Accordingly, in light of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with a liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application U/S 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual and in case such an application is moved within three weeks from today, the competent authority shall proceed to consider and decide the the same expeditiously in accordance with law. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 25.7.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench