SANJAY KUMAR JOSHI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND, THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
SPA/332/2018 · 2025-03-19
Ashish Naithani, Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15332 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15332 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
MCC No.10445 of 2025 (Correction Application) In SPA No.332 of 2018 Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
Mr. Harendra Belwal, learned counsel through VC along with Mr. Sagar Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant.
2. Mr. P. S. Bisht, learned Addl. CSC, for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. Correction Application has been filed by appellant with a prayer to correct as ‘Junior Assistant’ in place of ‘Junior Engineer’ mentioned in paragraph no.4 of the judgment and order dated
19.03.2025.
4. The said prayer is not opposed by the learned State counsel.
5. Accordingly, the correction application is allowed, and in paragraph no.4 ‘Junior Engineer’ be read as ‘Junior Assistant’ in the judgment and
order dated 19.03.2025.
(Ashish Naithani, J) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)
18.12.2025 NR/Akash