RAJMANI MISHRA v. DR. BALKAR SINGH, HOUSING COMMISSIONER, U.P. AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD LKO.
CAPL/2288/2025 · 2025-07-25
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153313 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153313 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43018 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2288 of 2025 Applicant :- Rajmani Mishra Opposite Party :- Dr. Balkar Singh, Housing Commissioner, U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Virendra Kumar Dubey Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
2. The instant contempt application has been filed by the applicant alleging disobedience of the order dated 15.05.2025 passed by this Court in Writ-A No. 5311 of 2025.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that as grievance of the applicant was not being considered, he preferred Writ-A No. 5311 of 2025, which was disposed of vide order dated 15.05.2025 with liberty to the applicant to move fresh representation within a period of fifteen days from the date of
order and if any representation is made, same shall be considered and decided by Housing Commissioner by a speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. It was also observed by the writ Court that if there is no legal impediment, the petitioner shall be paid arrears of pension and regular pension as well as gratuity with interest, which is admissible under the law. It is further submitted that the order of the writ Court was communicated to the respondent on 21.05.2025 and notice was issued on 01.07.2025 and 10.07.2025 by Assistant Commissioner for hearing, but the decision was not taken, hence, the respondent may be summoned and punished accordingly.
4. Sri Puneet Chandra, learned Special Counsel for U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, Lucknow was called and he has informed that the decision has already been taken on the representation of the applicant on 21.07.2025 with the observation that case of the applicant will be placed in the next Board Meeting.
Copy of the order dated 21.07.2025 placed before this Court is taken on record.
5. Considering the contents of the order of the writ Court as well as the order dated 21.07.2025 passed by Housing Commissioner, U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, Lucknow, it is evident that the representation of the applicant has already been decided with the observation that appropriate authority for taking decision on the grievance of the applicant is the Board and the applicant's grievance would be raised before the Board in its next meeting. Accordingly, the contempt application is
disposed of with the observation that the matter of the applicant shall be considered and decided in the next Board Meeting and same shall be communicated to the applicant.
Order Date :- 25.7.2025 Arpan Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench