Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15327 (KAR)

SRI LAKSHMINARASIMHAMURTHY v. THE LAND TRIBUNAL

WP/36170/2015 · 2025-03-06

N S Sanjay Gowda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:9795 WP No. 36170 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 36170 OF 2015 (LR) BETWEEN: SRI. LAKSHMINARASIMHAMURTHY, S/O LATE VENKATARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT SADENAHALLI, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 088. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HEMANTH KUMAR D, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE LAND TRIBUNAL, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, DEVANAHALLI - 561 203, BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 2. T.C.NARENDRA, S/O K. CHANNEGOWDA, AGED MAJOR, R/AT NO.36/2, N.G.BLOCK, 4TH DEVASANDRA ROAD, 16TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE - 560 003. SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR'S Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:9795 WP No. 36170 of 2015 2(a) SMT.SHYLINI NARENDRA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, W/O LATE T.C.NARENDRA, 2(b) MS.N.MITHALI, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, D/O LATE T.C.NARENDRA, 2(c) MR.N.MANISH, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, S/O LATE T.C.NARENDRA ALL ARE RESIDING AT FLAT NO.26/4, NARAYANA VILLA APARTMENT, NO.26, 16TH CROSS, 4TH TEMPLE STREET, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE - 560 003. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.VAHEEDA, AGA FOR R1; SRI.H.Y.RAJU AND SRI.H.Y.HARISH, ADVOCATES FOR R2(a-c)) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 16.05.2006 PASSED IN CASE NO.126, 128, 934, 943,/98-99 BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNEXURE - D PASSED BY ASST. COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPUR DIVISION, DEVANAHALLI, SO FAR PETITIONER CONCERNED AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:9795 WP No. 36170 of 2015 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioners. 2. Since the matter is of the year 2015, there is no justification for adjournment. 3. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE PSJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42