Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.572 of 2025 Date of decision: 17.06.2025 Rakesh Navharsh Singh. ...Petitioner. Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Anr. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Ms. Anuja Mehta, Advocate, vice Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioner alleges violation of decision rendered in Rakesh Navharsh Singh vs. State of Himachal Pradehs & Another1. 2. At this stage, learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record copy of order dated 04.06.2025, whereby the respondents have rejected the representation of the petitioner. 3. Taking note of the consideration order passed by the respondents, these contempt proceedings are closed, however, the petitioner is at liberty to seek appropriate 1CWP No.4865 of 2025 decided on 03.04.2025. -2- remedy in accordance with law for redressal of his surviving grievances, if any. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, to also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 17th June, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)