Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 153236 (ALL)

ASHOK KUMAR NISHAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. ENERGY LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/7016/2025 · 2025-07-30

Jaspreet Singh, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43949-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7016 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Nishad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Energy Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Nayak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manish Jauhari Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner alleges permanent disconnection of his electricity connection way back in 2002 but a demand of Rs.2,04,245/- has been raised by the Electricity Corporation towards dues as a consequence of which recovery citation has been issued by the revenue authorities, which is impugned herein. Shri Manish Jauhari, learned Counsel for the Electricity Corporation says that the application of the petitioner raising his grievance may be submitted before the opposite party No.3, who shall get the facts verified and do the needful. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the statement made by Shri Jauhari, learned Counsel for the Electricity Corporation with a further observation/direction that the application, if, submitted before the opposite party No.3 shall be considered and decided within four weeks. Till such decision is taken, the recovery citation shall not be acted upon by the revenue authorities, however, it shall remain subject to the decision to be taken as aforesaid. (Jaspreet Singh, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 30.7.2025 -Piyush- Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench