[2025:RJ-JP:21219] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5046/2025 Vikash @ Dhara Singh S/o Beerbalram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Dhani Mandawali, Tan. Sirohi, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar. (Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Neem Ka Thana). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, Dy.GA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 20/05/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.0093/2025 registered at Police Station Neem Ka Thaka, Sikar, District Sikar for the offence punishable under Sections 8, 20, 25 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the alleged recovered contraband is below the commercial quantity, and no other criminal case of a similar nature is pending against the petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 22.03.2025 and the trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:21219] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5046/2025] 3. Learned Deputy Government Advocate opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard and considered the contentions made by the learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that the alleged recovered contraband is below the commercial quantity and the petitioner is in custody since 22.03.2025, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow this bail application. 6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that the accused-petitioner Vikash @ Dhara Singh S/o Beerbalram shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every two months in the concerned police station. [2025:RJ-JP:21219] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5046/2025] 8. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 9. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/187