RAM GULAM YADAV v. ADDL. COMMISSIONER ADMINISTRATION, AYODHYA AND ANOTHER
A227/5064/2025 · 2025-08-26
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153168 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153168 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5064 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Rajan Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondent is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya, to decide Appeal No. 1501 of 2022 - Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. Ram Gulam and Others, U/S 331(3) of U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya, is directed to decide Appeal No. 1501 of 2022 - Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. Ram Gulam and Others, U/S 331(3) of U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
August 26, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajan Yadav, Gaurav Singh, Suraj Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Ram Gulam Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Addl. Commissioner Administration, Ayodhya And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench