Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 153151 (ALL)

AMIT RAWAT AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME AND OTHERS

CRLP/6651/2025 · 2025-07-28

Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43174-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6651 of 2025 Petitioner :- Amit Rawat And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Durgesh Kumar Singh,Prabhakar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A., who appears for the State-respondents and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed by petitioners with following main prayer(s): "A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari thereby quash the impugned First Information Report lodged by the opposite party No. 4 on 15.07.2025, at First Information Report No. 264 of 2025, Under Sections- 109, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of B.N.S., Police Station- Tikait Nagar, District Barabanki , (Contained as Annexure No.-1), in the interest of justice. B. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding the Opp. Parties 3 not to arrest the Petitioners in pursuance of impugned First Information Report lodged by the opposite party No. 4 on 15.07.2025, at First Information Report No. 264 of 2025, Under Sections- 109, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of B.N.S., Police Station- Tikait Nagar, District Barabanki (Contained as Annexure No.-1), in the interest of justice." 3. It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioners are poor and falsely implicated in the impugned F.I.R. only because they had asked remuneration/wages for the work done by them. 4. Learned A.G.A. has produced before this Court instructions sent by Shri Shiv Singh Kushwaha, Sub Inspector, Police Station Tikait Nagar, District Barabanki, which shows that there are incised wounds in the medico legal examination report of victim namely Smt. Mohini w/o Chet Ram, Chet Ram s/o Munna Lal and Raj Kumar s/o Munna Lal. Instructions are taken on record. 5. From perusal of the impugned F.I.R. it is evident that cognizable office is made out and this Court does not find any good ground to interfere in the impugned F.I.R. 6. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed. . (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Order Date :- 28.7.2025 Anupam S/- Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench