SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.2211 of 2017 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. T.A. Khan, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Vinay Bhatt, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Rahul Consul, learned counsel for respondent no.1. 3. Mr. Vaibhav Mahtolia, learned counsel for respondent nos.2, 3 & 4. 4. Mr. Shubham Pandey, learned counsel for respondent no.6. 5. Respondent nos.2 to 6 are the proforma respondents. The real dispute was there between the petitioner- Vishambhar Dayal and respondent no.1-Anil Kumar. 6. A compromise application (IA No.16833/2025) has been filed by the contesting parties, duly signed and verified by their respective Advocates. 7. By means of the present compromise application, petitioner and respondent no.1 have settled their dispute amicably and thus, the petitioner prayed this Court to decide the writ petition in terms of the compromise, annexure-1 to the compromise application. 8. In view of the statement made by contesting parties in the compromise application, the writ petition is disposed of, in terms of the compromise, annexure-1 to the compromise application. The compromise annxure-1 of the compromise application shall form part of this order. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 28.10.2025 AK