Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44851 Court No. - 11 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6781 of 2025 Applicant :- Smt. Maya Devi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Dist. Govt. Advocate Bahraich Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Singh,Vijayendra Prakash Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1.Heard Sri Harsh Prakash, Advocate holding brief of Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Arun Verma, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 2.As per learned counsel for the applicant, the present applicant (Smt. Maya Devi) is languishing in jail since 11.06.2025 in Case Crime No.167 of 2025, under Sections 85 & 80 (2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station-Rupaideeha, District-Bahraich. 3.Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the present applicant has been falsely implicated in this case as she has not committed any offence as alleged in the prosecution story. 4.Attention has been drawn towards the impugned F.I.R. wherein the general allegation has been levelled against all the accused persons including the present applicant. So as to implicate the entire family, the present applicant who is mother- in-law, has been implicated in this case. No specific role has been attributed to the present applicant. The cause of death is Asphyxia due to ante-mortem hanging. There is no other injuries except one ligature mark around the neck of the deceased, which might be cause on account of ante-mortem hanging. There might be some scuffle between the husband and wife on mobile, but she is not aware of such scuffle. 5.Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the present applicant is having no prior criminal history of any kind whatsoever. The present applicant was having cordial relation with his daughter-in-law (since deceased) and she has never demanded any dowry from her or her family members. He has undertaken on behalf of the present applicant that she shall co- operate in the investigation/trial proceedings properly and shall not misuse the liberty of bail, if so granted by this Court, and shall abide by all terms and conditions of bail order. 6.On the other hand, learned Additional Government Advocate has, however, opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that since the role of the present applicant was found in the commission of crime, therefore, she is not entitled for grant of bail, but he could not dispute the aforesaid contention of learned counsel for the applicant. 7.Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the material available on record; considering the fact that general allegation has been levelled against all the accused persons including the present applicant; no specific role has been attributed to the present applicant; the cause of death is Asphyxia as a result of ante-mortem hanging which might be caused on account of ante-mortem hanging; the present applicant was having cordial relation with her daughter-in-law (since deceased); the present applicant is having no prior criminal history of any kind whatsoever and the undertaking that she shall co-operate in the investigation/ trial proceedings properly and shall not misuse the liberty of bail and shall abide by all terms and conditions of bail order, without expressing any opinion on merits of the issue, I am of the view that the present applicant may be released on bail in this case. 8.Accordingly, the instant bail application is allowed. 9.Let the applicant (Smt. Maya Devi) be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on her furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A IPC/269 of the B.N.S., 2023. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C./84 of B.N.S.S., 2023 is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A IPC/208 of the B.N.S., 2023. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C./351 of B.N.S.S., 2023. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. The present applicant shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. Order Date :- 1.8.2025 Anurag Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench