Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:131348-DB Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9934 of 2014 Petitioner :- M/S Super Tannery Ltd. Respondent :- Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mayank Agrawal Counsel for Respondent :- A.N. Singh,Ajay Singh Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Sangam Tripathi, holding brief of Mr. Baleshwar Chaturvedi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Electricity Department. This petition has been filed for quashing the demand notice requiring the petitioner to pay additional security. It is pointed out by learned counsel for the parties that the issues raised in this petition have been decided against the petitioner in Writ-C No.30898 of 2016 (M/s Dev Prayag Paper Mill (Pvt.) Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.) by judgment and order dated 21 March, 2017 whereby this Court has dismissed the writ petition after coming to the conclusion that the demand of additional security by the distribution licensee is not bad. For all the reasons stated in the aforesaid judgment, this petition stands dismissed. Order Date :- 4.8.2025 Rakesh (Prashant Kumar J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH MEHTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad