Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 153128 (ALL)

RAHUL RAWAT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/6694/2025 · 2025-07-29

Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43617-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6694 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rahul Rawat Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin Secy. Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nisha Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This petition has been filed with the following main prayer:- "i. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of CERTIORARI to quash the impugned F.I.R. dated 06.07.2025 lodged by the opposite party no.4, at Case Crime No.-0274/2025, under section 333, 64 B.N.S., Police Station- Ram Sanehi Ghat, District- Barabanki, as contained in Annexure No.1 to this writ petition." 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the impugned F.I.R. has been lodged as a counterblast to the F.I.R. that was lodged by the petitioners way back on 09.04.2021 against the husband of the complainant, Sunil Yadav, under various sections of the I.P.C. as well as under S.C./S.T. Act. In the said F.I.R., after completion of the investigation, charge sheet bearing No.A191/2021 was filed against the accused persons. Trial in the said criminal case is still going on but in the meantime, only to create pressure on the witnesses, the impugned F.I.R. has been lodged. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for quashing of the First Information Report and produced before this Court instructions dated 18.07.2025 sent by Sri Naushad Ali Khan, Sub Inspector, Ramsanehighat, Barabanki. 5. Instructions are kept on record. 6 After having examined the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned FIR as well as instructions produced by learned A.G.A., we are of the opinion that the impugned F.I.R. discloses cognizable offence by the petitioner, hence, no interference is called for by this Court in its extraordinary power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing of the F.I.R. or for grant of any interim relief to the petitioner and accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 29.7.2025 Rahul Digitally signed by :- RAHUL TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench