NAJMA KHATOON v. STATE OF U.P.THRU.PRIN.SECY./ADDL.CHIEF SECY.REVENUE DEPTT.LKO. AND 8 OTHERS
WRIC/7118/2025 · 2025-08-01
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153126 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153126 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44715-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7118 of 2025 Petitioner :- Najma Khatoon Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy./Addl.Chief Secy.Revenue Deptt.Lko. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohiuddin Khan,Mohd.Zaid Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard Shri Mohiuddin Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Akansha Dubey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. The grievance of the petitioner is essentially against the opposite parties no. 8 and 9 who are private parties and alleged to have encroached the petitioner's land. Reliance has been placed on Annexure No. 10. We are not aware of any law under which official opposite parties could interfere in the matter unless there were legal proceedings drawn under some statute or there was an F.I.R. lodged, but, even then, the Revenue Authorities will not step in if there is an F.I.R. The petitioner should avail the remedies prescribed in law. At this stage, Ms. Akansha Dubey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel informed that the Court that some proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 had been initiated against which appeal has been filed. We express no opinion in this regard. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is
disposed of. . (Manish Kumar,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.)
Order Date :- 1.8.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench