Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 153092 (ALL)

C/M KRANTI VIDYA MANDIR THRU. MANAGER CHANDRA MAULI SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/8120/2025 · 2025-07-29

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43701 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8120 of 2025 Petitioner :- C/M Kranti Vidya Mandir Thru. Manager Chandra Mauli Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Technical Education Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Paavan Awasthi,Bhanu Bajpai,Vatsal Rastogi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Supplementary affidavit filed today in Court be kept on record. An amendment application has also been filed today in Court which is also taken on record. Learned Standing counsel states that he does not want to file any objection to the amendment application. Accordingly, the amendment application is required. Let necessary amendment be incorporated during the course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondents. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that after the recruitment process has been completed by the petitioner i.e the Committee of Management, the same has been sent for approval to the District Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Lucknow and the same is still pending for consideration till date. It is prayed that the respondent no. 2 i.e District Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Lucknow be directed to take a final decision in the matter. Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned Standing counsel argues that the rules appear to have undergone an amendment and as such, recruitment as has been done by the petitioner may not have been validly done. However, he concedes that the same is still pending for consideration before the respondent no. 2 and a final decision would be taken in this regard within a specified time. On the other hand, learned counsel for the petitioner states that recruitment has been carried out perfectly in accordance with rules and there is no infirmity in the same Considering the aforesaid, the instant writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondent no. 2 to take a final decision in the matter in accordance with law and the relevant rules which decision would be taken within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case as set forth by the petitioner. Order Date :- 29.7.2025 Pachhere/- Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench