Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:20086
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2661 of 2019 1 - Akalesh Kumar S/o Shri Dev Kran Aged About 29 Years R/o Village Kamraud, Post Chourel, Tahsil Gunderdehi, District- Balod, Chhattisgah., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ku. Giteshwari Patel D/o Shri Dev Karan Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Kamraud, Post Chourel, Tahsil Gunderdehi, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh., District : Balod,
Chhattisgarh 3 - Vinay Kumar Sahu S/o Amar Singh Sahu Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Andhiyarkhop, Near Tank, Block Colony Arang, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Secretary Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Director Directorate Of Chhattisgarh Public Instruction, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Collector Beejapur District- Beejapur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bijapur, Chhattisgarh
2 5 - District Education Officer Beejapur, District- Beejapur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bijapur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Beejapur, District- Beejapur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bijapur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : None present. For Respondents No. 1 to 4 For Respondent No. 5 : : Ms. Mukta Tripathi, Panel Lawyer Mr. B. S. Rajput, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board 01/05/2025
1. On previous date of hearing, none appeared for the petitioners nor represented through counsel. Today also, despite repeated calls neither petitioners appeared nor represented by any counsel, therefore, in these circumstances, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge amit
AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Date: 2025.05.03 11:42:26 +0530