BRIJLAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS
WRIC/6967/2025 · 2025-07-25
Alok Mathur
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153081 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153081 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:42939 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6967 of 2025 Petitioner :- Brijlal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dilip Kumar Pandey,Manoj Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Shri Dilip Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel on behalf of respondents no.1 to 4.
2. In light of proposed order, notice to the private respondents is dispensed with.
3. It has been submitted by counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is a recorded tenure holder of Gata No.216, Village Para, Pargana & Tehsil Patti, District Pratapgarh and had filed an application under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code. The said application was allowed by means of order dated 25.09.2023 and had confirmed the demarcation report dated
10.01.2023. The order for fixing of the pillars was also passed on 20.09.2023 and the orders were complied but after fixing the pillars, the private respondents have uprooted the said pillars and damaged the boundary and in this regard, a first information report has also been lodged on 28.06.2025.
4. It is in the aforesaid circumstances, the petitioner has moved another application for fixing the boundary pillars in pursuance to the order dated 25.02.2023. In the aforesaid circumstance, the petitioner has prayed that a suitable direction be issued to opposite party no.2 to fix the boundary pillars.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has opposed the the petition but considering the submission of the petitioner especially the facts that the boundary pillars have been uprooted, it is noticed that under Section 23, an appropriate application can be given to the said Sub Divisional Officer, who can pass appropriate orders to restore boundary wall or to repair or replace the same in such manner as may be prescribed.
6. Accordingly, the respondent no.2 is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on the application of the petitioner dated 30.06.2025 as contained in Annexure No.1 to the petition, with expedition, say within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of the order is produced before him in accordance with law.
7. With the aforesaid directions, the petition is disposed of. [Alok Mathur,J.] Order Date :- 25.7.2025 KR Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench