2025:JHHC:20201-DB Page | 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OFJHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. A (D.B.) No. 681 of 2025 --------- 1. Pyara Wilson Bage, aged about 45 years, Son of Late Luis Bage. 2. Sujata Bage aged about 38 years, Wife of Pyara Wilson Bage. Both resident at Village Hajaribera, P.O. Lachragarh, P.S. Kolebira, District- Simdega, At present resident at village Karimati Basti, P.O. & P.S. Jaldega, District- Simdega (Jharkhand). … … Appellants Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Respondent --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ---------- For the Appellants : Mr. Gaurav, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Spl.P.P. ----------- 04/Dated:22nd July, 2025 1. Heard Mr. Gaurav, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 08.05.2025 passed by Learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Simdega in B.P. No. 61 of 2025 arising out of Bano P.S. Case No. 21 of 2025, whereby and whereunder the prayer for regular bail of the appellants was rejected. 3. It has been alleged that the daughter of the informant along with his niece were enticed away by the appellants and were taken to Jaipur Kothi for selling them. 4. It has been submitted that so far as the transfer of money in the bank account of the appellant no.2 is concerned, the same was on account of domestic work the appellant no.2 was doing in the house of one Lalit Jain and subsequently, appellant no.2 had transferred the same amount to the account of appellant no.1 as 2025:JHHC:20201-DB Page | 2 well. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that the appellants are languishing in jail since 25.03.2025 and it has also been submitted that the appellants do not have any criminal antecedents. 5. Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, learned Spl.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellants and has submitted that both the appellants were involved in human trafficking and the money which has been transferred to the bank account of appellant no.2 is a pointer to the said fact. 6. Regard being had to entire facets of the case that the children were recovered on the same day, apart from a plausible explanation which has been submitted by the appellant no.2 with respect to money which was transferred in her account, we while setting aside the order dated 08.05.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Simdega in B.P. No. 61 of 2025 arising out of Bano P.S. Case No. 21 of 2025 direct the appellant be released on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Simdega. 7. Accordingly, this appeal is allowed. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Amar/-