APHC010194982025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: Between: Kalla Raju The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. R SIVA SAI SWARUP Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is disputing the relation between the petitioner and the respondent Nos.2 & 3 and seeks to quash the order passed in Criminal Revision Petition No.01 of 2023 on the file of XII Additional D On enquiry, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that there IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4140/2025 ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: R SIVA SAI SWARUP Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is disputing the relation between the petitioner and the respondent Nos.2 & 3 and seeks to quash the order passed in Criminal Revision Petition No.01 of 2023 on the file of XII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam. On enquiry, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that there IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3457] ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is disputing the relation between the petitioner and the respondent Nos.2 & 3 and seeks to quash the order passed in Criminal Revision Petition No.01 of istrict and Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam. On enquiry, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that there 2 is no non-bailable warrant pending against the petitioner and that the petitioner would be due around Rs.2,50,000/- payable to the respondent Nos.2 and 3. 3. Considering the submissions that the petitioner has not paid any amount, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the petition. 4. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 23.04.2025 PNS