APHC010195442020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 12638/2020 Between: 1. B VENKATESWARAMMA, FATHER NAME. B.SRINIVASA RAO AGE. 50, POTUMIDA VILLAGE, KODURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT AMARAVATHI 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KODURU POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. PADAMATI ADISESHU, S/O PUNNAIAH, AGE. MAJOR, R/O POTUMIDA VILLAGE, KODURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. PADAMATI KIRAN KUMAR, S/O ADISESHU, AGE MAJOR, R/O POTUMIDA VILLAGE, KODURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. PADAMATI SURESH, S/O ADISESHU, AGE. MAJOR, R/O POTUMIDA VILLAGE, KODURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 7. ADDANKI NANCHARAMMA, W/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGE .MAJOR, R/O POTUMIDA VILLAGE, KODURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 8. JANNU SUBBA RAO, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER AGE. MAJOR, R/O POTUMIDA VILLAGE, KODURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 9. JANNU LAKSHMI, W/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGE. MAJOR, R/O POTUMIDA VILLAGE, KODURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents 2 and 3 in taking legal action against Unofficial Respondents No.4 to 9 by registering the FIR and conducting investigation as per the 2 complaint lodged by the petitioner Dt.24-06-2020 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to ensure petitioner and her family members use the by lane, without obstruction by unofficial respondents for their passage and pass such other order or orders my deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. THADIKONDA KOTESHWARA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. SEEPANI S KUMAR 3. KALYAN C R The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “..... to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents 2 and 3 in taking legal action against Unofficial Respondents No.4 to 9 by registering the FIR and conducting investigation as per the complaint lodged by the petitioner Dt.24-06-2020 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to ensure petitioner and her family members use the by lane, without obstruction by unofficial respondents for their passage and pass such other order or orders my deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. and to pass ....” Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State, on instructions, would submit that respondent Police are not interfering in the civil disputes pending between the Petitioner and the unofficial respondents and that this Court may pass appropriate orders by disposing of this Writ Petition. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. 3 In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedies before appropriate forum according to law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 12638 of 2020 04.09.2025 Mjl /*