Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15299 (AP)

Chabattula Lakshmana Rao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/10472/2025 · 2025-07-06

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2v APHC010194312025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 10472 OF 2025 Between: Chabattula Lakshmana Rao, S/o Late Ch. Samparrao, Aged about 46 Occ Agriculture, R/o Dusdnapudi Village, Veeravasargm Mandal Godavari Digtrict. years, , West ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, West Godavari District. 3. The District Panchayat Officer, Office of the District Panchayat Officer, West Godavari District, Eluru. 4. The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Veeravasaram Mandal, West Godavari District. O/o M.P.D.O. 5. The Dusanapudi Gram Panchayat, Dusanapudi Village, Veeravasaram Mandal, West Godgvari District. Rep. By its Panchayat Secretary, 6. Smt Kolia Adi Lakshmi, W/o Kolia Yesu, Aged about 35yrs, Occ Housewife, R/o Dusanapudi Village, Veeravasaram Mandal Godavari District. West ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.5, in awarding the work of water supply maintenance and pump operator services to the 6th Smt. Kolia Adiiakshmi, ignoring the lower tender bids submitted by myself and my son, and violating the principles of transparency and fairness in public tenders, as illegal, arbitrary, mala fide, and in violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to conduct a fresh and fair evaluation of tenders submitted for the said post, strictly in accordance with law respondent i.e. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation and implementation of the tender awarded by the 5th respondent Gra Panchayat, Dusanapudi, in favour of the 6th respondent, Smt. Kolia Adiiakshmi, pursuant to Notification Rc. No.35/2021, dated rr> I I I 01.02.2024, for water supply maintenance and pump operator services for the financial year 2024-2025, by restraining the 6 respondent and any unauthorized persons acting on her behalf, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B K CHAKRAVARTHY, LEARNED COUNSEL APPEARING FOR M/S. VENKATASIVARANI NAGULA Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 3: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEV The Court made the following order; APHC010194312025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurfsdiction) SMB [3328] MONDAY,THESEVENTHDAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 10472/2025 Between; 1.CHABATTULA LAKSHMANA RAO,, S/0 LATE CH. SAMPARRAO, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/0 DUSANAPUDI VILLAGE, VEERAVASARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. \ 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3.THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ELURU. 4.THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, 0/0 M.P.D.O., VEERAVASARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5.THE DUSANAPUDI GRAM PANCHAYAT, DUSANAPUDI VILLAGE, VEERAVASARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, 6.SMT KOLIA ADI LAKSHMI, W/0 KOLIA YESU AGED ABOUT 35YRS,, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/0 DUSANAPUDI VILLAGE, VEERAVASARAM MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT{S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VENKATASIVARANI NAGULA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Sri B.K.Chakravarthy, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri N.V.Siva Rani, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner case has become infructuous. on instructions, submits that this 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. Sd/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECri^OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, West Godavari District. 3. The District Panchayat Officer, Office of the District West Godavari District, Eluru. 4. The Panchayat Officer, Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Veeravasaram Mandal, West Godavari District. 5. The Panchayat Secretary, Dusanapudi Gram Panchayat, Dusanapudi Village, Veeravasaram Mandal, West Godavari District. O/o M.P.D.O., 6. One CC to SRI VENKATAS!VARAN I NAGULA Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEV High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Two CD Copies 7. 8. gsg HIGH COURT DATED: 07/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 10472 OF 2025 g( 17 SEP 2025 ^SCuiTint Sectitax*^ lO /T-l DISPOSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS