RAVINDRA NATH SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
CRLP/6643/2025 · 2025-07-28
Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152968 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152968 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43340-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6643 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ravindra Nath Singh And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Karunesh Singh,Vijay Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Vakalatnama' filed by Shri Saurabh Yadav, Advocate on behalf of respondent nos.4 and 5 is taken on record.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) as well as learned A.G.A. for the State, Shri Saurabh Yadav, learned counsel for respondent nos.4 and 5 and perused the record.
3. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner(s) with following main prayer:
"1. Issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of CERTIORARI quashing the impugned FIR No. 129/2025, U/s: 333/115(2)/352/351(3) B.N.S., P.S.- Karaundikalan, District Sultanpur, dated 26.06.2025( As contained in the Annexure No.1).
2. Issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding and directing to the opposite parties no 1 to 3 not to proceed further against the petitioners on the basis of the impugned first information report. (As contained in Annexure No.1)"
4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. In fact two first information reports have been registered with regard to the same incident.
5. Learned A.G.A. has produced before this Court instructions sent by Shri Sant Kumar, Sub Inspector, Police Station Karaundikalan, District Sultanpur, wherein it has been stated that after completion of investigation, Charge Sheet No.A-90 dated 01.07.2025 has been prepared against the accused namely Rajnath Singh, Vipin Singh @ Amit Singh and submitted before the supervisory authority. The instructions are taken on record.
6. Sufficient evidence may have been collected against accused
persons, therefore, this Court finds it inappropriate to interfere and quash the F.I.R. as prayed for.
7. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. . (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Order Date :- 28.7.2025 Anupam S/- Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench