HAKIM UDDIN SK @ HAKIM ALI v. MD. JOBBAR ALI SK AND 16 ORS.
CRP(IO)/266/2024 · 2025-05-15
Devashis Baruah
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15290 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15290 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/6 GAHC010144492024
2025:GAU-AS:6177
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP(IO)/266/2024 HAKIM UDDIN SK @ HAKIM ALI S/O- LATE ABBAS ALI SARKAR, R/O- VILL.- JOGIR MAHAL PART-I, P.S. AND P.O. BILASIPARA, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 783348. VERSUS MD. JOBBAR ALI SK AND 16 ORS. S/O- LATE DHANIA SK, R/O- VILL.- JOGIR MAHAL PART-I, P.O. GHASBARI, P.S. BILASIPARA, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 783346. 2:SEKANDAR ALI SK S/O- LATE SORABADI SARKAR R/O- VILL.- JAYPUR P.O. GHASBARI P.S. BILASIPARA DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 783348. 3:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY COLLECTOR DIST. DHUBRI PIN- 783301. 4:A.S.O. BILASIPARA CIRCLE P.O. HAKAMA P.S. BILASIPARA DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 783348. Page No.# 2/6 5:BANU SK @ KANU SK S/O- SIKAR ALI R/O- VILL.- JOGIR MAHAL PART-I P.O. JHARBARI P.S. BILASIPARA DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 783348. 6:SAFIAR RAHMAN S/O- UPA ALI R/O- VILL.- JOGIR MAHAL PART-I P.O. JHARBARI P.S. BILASIPARA DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 783348. 7:ON THE DEATH OF KACHIMUDDIN HIS LEGAL HEIRS AHAR ALI R/O- VILL.- JOGIR MAHAL PART-III P.O. GHASBARI P.S. BILASIPARA DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 783348. 8:MOKBUL ALI R/O- VILL.- JOGIR MAHAL PART-III P.O. GHASBARI P.S. BILASIPARA DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 783348. 9:SOKBUL ALI R/O- VILL.- JOGIR MAHAL PART-III P.O. GHASBARI P.S. BILASIPARA DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 783348. 10:AKBUL ALI R/O- VILL.- JOGIR MAHAL PART-III P.O. GHASBARI P.S. BILASIPARA DIST. DHUBRI
Page No.# 3/6 ASSAM PIN- 783348. 11:KULSUM BIBI R/O- VILL.- JOGIR MAHAL PART-III P.O. GHASBARI P.S. BILASIPARA DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 783348. 12:WAHED ALI S/O- DHANIA SK R/O- VILL.- JOGIR MAHAL PART-III P.O. GHASBARI P.S. BILASIPARA DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 783348. 13:LOKMAN ALI S/O- DHANIA SK R/O- VILL.- JOGIR MAHAL PART-III P.O. GHASBARI P.S. BILASIPARA DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 783348. 14:ON THE DEATH OF TOYEZ UDDIN HIS LEGAL HEIRS SAFIAR RAHMAN (WIFE) R/O- VILL.- NAGARJHAR P.O. DAKHIN BIJNI P.S. MANIKPUR DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN- 783390. 15:JAHIRUL HOQUE (SON) R/O- VILL.- NAGARJHAR P.O. DAKHIN BIJNI P.S. MANIKPUR DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN- 783390. 16:SHAHIDUR RAHMAN (SON) R/O- VILL.- NAGARJHAR
Page No.# 4/6 P.O. DAKHIN BIJNI P.S. MANIKPUR DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN- 783390. 17:OHIDUL HOQUE (SON) R/O- VILL.- NAGARJHAR P.O. DAKHIN BIJNI P.S. MANIKPUR DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN- 783390 For the petitioner (s) : Mr. N. N. Upadhyaya, Advocate
For the respondent (s) : Mr. R. Hoque, Advocate
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R
16.05.2025
Heard Mr.
N. N. Upadhyaya, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. R. Hoque, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent No.1. None has appeared on behalf of the respondent No.2. As regard the proforma respondents, no steps were taken by the petitioner inspite of obtaining a stay order from this Court. 2. Be that as it may, the instant proceedings have been filed challenging the order dated 27.05.2024 passed by the Court of
Page No.# 5/6 the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bilasipara in Misc.(J) Case No.166/2023 whereby an application filed under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘the Code’) for amendment of the plaint was rejected. 3. This Court has duly taken note of the application filed under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code by the petitioner who is the plaintiff as well as the impugned order. First of all, it is relevant to take note of that the trial of Title Suit No.84/2021 has already commenced. It is also relevant to take note of that on earlier occasion, another application was filed by the petitioner seeking amendment which was allowed, that too at a stage when the trial had commenced. This is the second application filed seeking amendment of the plaint. There is not a single whisper in the said application as regards the due diligence as to why this application could not be filed earlier. 4. Taking into account the above, this Court finds no ground to interfere with the order dated 27.05.2024 passed in Misc.(J) Case No.166/2023. 5. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed. 6. The stay order dated 02.08.2024 passed by this Court is vacated. 7. Parties are directed to appear before the learned Trial Court
Page No.# 6/6 on 02.06.2025 for further proceedings of the suit. JUDGE Comparing Assistant