APHC010194222014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 21504/2014 Between: 1. M.MURALI, S/O.LATE M HANUMANTHA RAO AGED ABOUT : 67 YEARS, OCC : SERVICE H.NO.10-50-59/1, WALTAIR MAIN ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. M.PARDHASARADHI, S/O.LATE M HANUMANTHA RAO AGED ABOUT : 62 YEARS, OCC : RETD. EMPLOYEE VENKOJIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. M.R.C.PRASAD, S/O.LATE.M. HANUMANTHA RAO AGED ABOUT : 60 YEARS, OCC : SERVICE. H.NO.10-50-59/1, WALTAIR MAIN ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. M.VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O.LATE M HANUMANTHA RAO AGED ABOUT : 58 YEARS, OCC : SERVICE H.NO.10-50-59/1, WALTAIR MAIN ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM. 5. SMT.MANGALAGIRI NAGA SUDHA, W/O.M.PRARDHASARADHI H.NO.10-50-59/1, WALTAIR MAIN ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM. 6. SMT SHAKUNTALA, W/O.LATE. CH SREE RAMA KOTESWARA RAO AGED : 65 YEARS, OCC : HOUSEWIFE H.NO.10-50-59/1, WALTAIR MAIN ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM. 7. SMT. MANGALAGIRI DHANA LAKSHMI, W/O.MRC PRASAD AGED : 54 YEARS, OCC : HOUSEWIFE H.NO.10-50-59/1, WALTAIR MAIN ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM. 8. SMT. BELLAMKONDA VARALAKSHMI, W/O.B VENKATESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT : 56 YEARS, OCC : HOUSEWIFE H.NO.10-50- 59/1, WALTAIR MAIN ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2 9. YENDAMURI RAMESH KUMAR, S/O.Y VEERA SWAMY AGED ABOUT : 54 YEARS, OCC : SERVICE H.NO.10-50-59/1, WALTAIR MAIN ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM. 10. JAKULA SRIDHAR, S/O.VENKATA RAO AGED ABOUT : 54 YEARS, OCC : SERVICE H.NO.10-50-59/1, WALTAIRPETITIONERS MAIN ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL, CORPORATION, V ISAKHAPATNAM REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE (JA) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K B RAMANNA DORA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) The Court made the following: 3 Order:- Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and become infructuous. 2. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dt. 10.09.2025 SR