W.P.(MD)No.20310 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.07.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR W.P.(MD).No.20310 of 2025 Sheeladevi ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kallikudi Taluk, Madurai District. 2. The Tahsildar, Kallikudi Taluk, Madurai District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to subdivide the property in plat No.109 in Ambika Nagar, respectively situated at S.No.15/4A to an extent of 1200Sq.ft., Sivarakkottai Village, Kallikudi Taluk, Madurai District and thereafter, issue separate patta to the petitioner's name within the period For Petitioner : Mr.V.G.Vallarasu Chezhian For Respondents : Mr.A.Baskaran Additional Government Pleader 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.20310 of 2025 ORDER The petitioner herein seeks a direction to the respondents to sub divide and issue separate Patta in respect of the property purchased by him in S.No.15/4A in Sivarakkottai Village, Kallikudi Taluk, Madurai District. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.A.Baskaran, learned Additional Government Pleader who takes notice for the respondents. 3. By consent of both the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 4. According to the petitioner, he purchased 1200 sq.ft of land in Plot No.109 in the above mentioned survey number under a registered sale deed dated 20.04.2000. He submitted an online application on 06.10.2024, seeking issuance of separate Patta, however, the same has not been considered till date. Hence, the petitioner has come before this Court. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.20310 of 2025 5. The learned Additional Government who takes notice for the respondents would submit that Patta for the subject property stands in the name of three persons who are not vendors of the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner's request has not been considered. 6. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the names of some of the purchaser like the petitioner has been included in Patta No.1265 erroneously for the entire extent of the land. Therefore, the respondents may be directed to consider the request of the petitioner. 7. In view of the rival contentions raised by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, is inclined to direct the 1st respondent to consider the online application of the petitioner dated 06.10.2024 in A.No. 2024/0105/24/663545 and pass final orders on its own merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.20310 of 2025 receipt of a copy of this order, after issuing notice to the petitioner and the pattadhars mentioned in Patta No.1265. 8. With these directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 25.07.2025 NCC :yes/No Index :yes/No Internet:yes/No rgm 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.20310 of 2025 To 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kallikudi Taluk, Madurai District. 2. The Tahsildar, Kallikudi Taluk, Madurai District. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.20310 of 2025 S.SOUNTHAR , J. rgm W.P.(MD).No.20310 of 2025 25.07.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis