23.07.2025 Ct. No.7 Sl. No.12 akd W. P. A. 22226 of 2016 (CAN 3 of 2023) [VPH Construction Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. -Vs- State Bank of India & Ors.] Mr. Saptangshu Basu ..Sr. Adv. Mr. Rohit Banerjee Mr. Arindam Paul Ms. Sohini Choudhury … … for the petitioners Mr. Anjan Kumar Paul … … for the SBI Mr. Rohit Das Ms. Kishwar Rahman Ms. Sristi Roy Ms. Anugraha Sundas … … for respondent nos.3 & 4 [ARCIL] 1. Heard learned Advocates appearing for the respective parties. 2. During the course of hearing, Mr. Rohit Das, learned Advocate appearing for respondent nos. 3 and 4, highlights that no affidavit in respect of the application being CAN 3 of 2023 has been called for from the said respondents. Accordingly, he prays for leave to file an affidavit-in-opposition to the said application. 3. Record reveals that CAN 3 of 2023 was filed as far back as in the year 2023 and was served upon all the respondents. However, no leave was prayed for on behalf of respondent nos. 3 and 4 to file an affidavit-in-opposition. However, to address the issue effectively, leave is granted to the respondents to file their affidavit-in-opposition of the application, CAN 3 of 2023. 4. Let affidavit-in-opposition to the application, CAN 3 of 2023 be filed within a period of two weeks from date. Reply, if any, be filed a week thereafter. 2 5. List the matter for further consideration under the same heading three weeks hence. (Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)