APHC010194212018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8447 Between: K.V. Ramakrishna Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G VASANTHA RAYUDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: ORDER:- The instant Writ Petition is filed India for the following relief: “to issue a Writ of Mandamus No.PA/5411/2018 Rajahmundry dated 09. capricious, unlawful, inequitable principles of natural justice and consequentially to set aside the same and to direct the Respondents to permit the Petitioner to resume the duties in the Respondent Corporation IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8447 OF 2018 AND Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation and ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: G VASANTHA RAYUDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): The Court made the following: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned orders vide No.PA/5411/2018 Rajahmundry dated 09.02.2018 as arbitrary inequitable, unfair and contrary to law and violative of principles of natural justice and consequentially to set aside the same and to direct the Respondents to permit the Petitioner to resume the duties in the Respondent Corporation and pass such other orders”. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3396] THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) under Article 226 of the Constitution of ing the impugned orders vide 2018 as arbitrary, illegal, unfair and contrary to law and violative of principles of natural justice and consequentially to set aside the same and to direct the Respondents to permit the Petitioner to resume the duties in the 2. None represented for the petitioner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that in the light of interim order passed by this Court dated 15.03.2018, the suspension of the petitioner is revoked and no further orders are required in this matter. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 5. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. _____________________________________ JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 03.03.2025 KK