YOGENDRA SINGH S/O SH. BHOOP SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/4727/2024 · 2025-03-17
Anil Kumar Upman
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15272 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15272 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:11861] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4727/2024 Yogendra Singh S/o Sh. Bhoop Singh, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Village Khedidevi Singh, Police Station Nadbai, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan, Presently Residing At Gali No. 10, Kasganj Road, Nadbai, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Accused Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP Jaipur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Kabra For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 17/03/2025
1. The instant pre-arrest bail application has been filed under Section 438 of CRPC on behalf of the petitioner, who is having apprehension of his arrest in connection with FIR No.543/2023 registered at Police Station Nadbai, District Bhartatpur for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that as per FIR, there is a civil dispute between the parties. He submits that petitioner has already joined the investigation. It is submitted that entire offence is based on documents which are already in possession of the Investigating Agency. Counsel further submits that custodial interrogation of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose.
3. Learned State Counsel opposes the submissions made by the
learned counsel for the petitioner, however, he fairly concedes that petitioner has joined the investigation.
[2025:RJ-JP:11861] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4727/2024]
4. Considering the contentions put-forth by the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, as also considering the nature of dispute; petitioner has already joined the investigation, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to allow this anticipatory bail application.
5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Nadbai, District Bharatpur in FIR No.543/2023 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner – Yogendra Singh S/o Sh. Bhoop Singh, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAURAV KUMAR /731