CHHEDAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
A482/5899/2025 · 2025-07-30
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152712 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152712 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44061 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5899 of 2025 Applicant :- Chhedan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Shiv Pal Singh,Ambrish Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. Heard Sri Shiv Pal Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Satyendra Yadav, learned AGA for the State. By means of instant application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, applicant has challenged the validity of the order dated 24.06.2025 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bahraich in Case No. 4569 of 2021, under Sections 419, 420, 406 IPC, Police Station-Kaisarganj, District-Bahraich, whereby application seeking discharge has been rejected. Learned AGA for the State has raised preliminary objection by stating that applicant has got a statutory remedy of filing a revision under Section 397 Cr.P.C. On being confronted with the aforesaid, learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press the application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C and he will file revision under Section 397 Cr.P.C. or 401 Cr.P.C. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as not pressed leaving it open for the applicant to file revision under Section 397 Cr.P.C. or 401 Cr.P.C. Let certified copy of the documents annexed with this application be returned to the learned counsel for the applicant as per Rules after retaining photostat of the same on record. Order Date :- 30.7.2025 Vinay/- Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench