2025:HHC:15469 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 3316 of 2025 Decided on : 23.05.2025 State of Himachal Pradesh. …Petitioner Versus M/s Superflow Pvt. Limited. …Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. For the respondents : Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Senior Advocate, with M/s Pranshul Sharma and Arch Chauhan, Advocates. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) When this case was taken up for consideration, learned Additional Advocate General submits that as there is a technical defect in the memo of parties of the writ petition, it would be in the interest of justice, in case, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh, on the same cause. 2. As there indeed appears to be a technical defect in 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:15469 the memo of parties, as Officer through whom the writ petition has been filed, is one who has passed one of the orders in the case, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn, with liberty, as prayed for. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge May 23, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)