ANJEET SAROJ v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
NABAIL/891/2025 · 2025-07-22
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152707 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152707 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:41930 Court No. - 14 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 891 of 2025 Applicant :- Anjeet Saroj Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Sarjoo Ram,Aklavya,Mamta Rawat,Prashant Shekhar,Ravi Kant Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. The present application under Section 438 Cr.P.C./482 B.N.S.S. has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in FIR/Case Crime No. 231 of 2024, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3), 288, 109, 110 of B.N.S., P.S. Baghrai, District Pratapgarh. In the prosecution case, it is alleged that the applicant along with the co-accused with a common intent armed with deadly weapons have beaten the complainant and his friend Gaurav Pandey with lathi-danda as well as with the butt of a countrymade pistol.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the anticipatory bail application. Perused the record. A perusal of the record shows that there are two injured persons. The first injured Shakti Singh has received three injuries, out of which injury No. 1 is a lacerated wound on left parietal region. The second injured Gaurav Pandey has received six injuries, out of which four injuries are lacerated wounds on occipital and parietal region. The applicant is named in the FIR. The injured have also named the applicant and supported the prosecution case. Hence, it cannot be said that the applicant has been
falsely implicated in the case. In view of the above, no ground for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is rejected.
Order Date :- 22.7.2025 Shravan Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench