Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1527 (UTT)

VEENA SHARMA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/48/2025 · 2025-01-30

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No. 48 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Lalit Sharma and Ms. Sadaf, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. V.S. Rawat, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. Learned State counsel informed to this court that the S.S.P. concerned have provided sufficient protection to the petitioner and as such writ petition has become infructuous. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Lalit Sharma submits that when the petition was disposed of finally the concerned Investigating Officer gives the statement for dropping the proceeding of Section 145 Cr.P.C. 5. On the request of learned State counsel, put up this matter on 04.03.2025 in order to enable him to get the instruction in the matter. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 25.02.2025 PR