ISHWAR WATI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
A227/4328/2025 · 2025-07-22
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152675 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152675 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:41923 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4328 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ishwar Wati Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deeksha Pal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents are dispensed with.
3. By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India a prayer has been made for expeditious disposal of Suit No. 14140 of 2024 Computerized Suit No. T202410330114140 (Ishwar Wati Vs. Vijay Pal and others), pending before respondent No. 2.
4. It is urged that though the matter is being listed but for one reason or the other, the Suit No. 14140 of 2024 Computerized Suit No. T202410330114140 (Ishwar Wati Vs. Vijay Pal and others) is not being decided.
5. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that trial Court may be directed to decide the Suit No. 14140 of 2024 Computerized Suit No. T202410330114140 (Ishwar Wati Vs. Vijay Pal and others) in a time bound manner.
6. At this stage, no ground for urgency is made out by the petitioner, hence, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the trial Court/competent authority and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of Suit No. 14140 of 2024 Computerized Suit No. T202410330114140 (Ishwar Wati Vs. Vijay Pal and others), within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the trial Court/competent authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case any case for urgency is made out by the petitioner, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, in accordance with law.
7. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of
either of the parties on merit and the Court/authority concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.
8. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 22.7.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench