Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15264 (KAR)

SRI V ASHWATH v. SRI RUKMINIAMMA

RFA/1483/2021 · 2025-01-16

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1774 RFA No. 1483 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1483 OF 2021 BETWEEN: SRI V.ASHWATH S/O LATE SRI VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/A NO.95, 2ND CROSS, MUNESHWARA NAGAR, KOWDENAHALLI, RAMAMURTHY NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 016. …APPELLANT (BY SRI.MAHESH KUMAR., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SRI RUKMINIAMMA D/O RANGAIAH SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT PRAKASH TRADERS, RAMAMURTHY NAGAR MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-560 016. 2. SRI R.PRAKASH S/O SRI RAMU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/A NO.81, BHOOPASANDRA MAIN ROAD, NAGASHETTYHALLI, BANGALORE-560 094. 3. THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, MAHADEVAPURA RANGE, BANGALORE. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1774 RFA No. 1483 of 2021 4. THE COMMISSIONER, BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, HUDSON CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560 002. …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLI RULE 1 READ WITH UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the appellant is not represented. When the case is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. His absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 15.01.2025, on that day, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the appellant it was ordered to be listed on 16.01.2025. The appeal is listed today for appearance of counsel of the appellant. As already noted above, when the case is called, the appellant is not represented. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1774 RFA No. 1483 of 2021 First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5