MANOJ KUMAR RAI v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
A483/557/2025 · 2025-07-31
Rajnish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152602 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152602 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 557 of 2025 Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Rai Opposite Party :- The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Gauri Suwan Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. On an objection raised by learned AGA that all the accused(s) have not been impleaded, Shri Ashish, Advocate holding brief of Shri Gauri Suwan Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant submits that inadvertently they could not be impleaded. He prays for permitting to implead the remaining accused as respondent nos. 4 to 7. To which there is no objection by the other side. In view of above, the applicant is permitted to implead the remaining accused as respondent nos. 4 to 7 during course of the day. The application has been filed for disposal of the Complaint Case No. 1227 of 2017 in regard to which an application has been filed by the applicant before the concerned court on 01.10.2024, a copy of which is enclosed as Annexure No. 4. In view of above, without entering into merits of the case, the application is disposed of with direction to concerned court to consider the application filed by the applicant on 01.10.2024 within a period of two weeks and proceed accordingly. Order Date :- 31.7.2025 Raj Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench