Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:12049 WP No. 2608 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 2608 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI. ANANDA N.
S/O LATE NARASIMHAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS WORKING AS BILL COLLECTOR (NOW UNDER SUSPENSION) HOSAYALANADU GRAMA PANCHAYATH JAVANAGONDANAHALLI HOBLI HIRIYUR TALUK, CHITRADURGA DIST.
R/AT HOSAYALANADU VILLAGE HIRIYUR TALUK -577 598
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ARAVIND H, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYATH
RAJ DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING
VIDHANA VEEDHI, BANGALORE -560 001
2.
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PANCHAYAT CHITRADURGA DISTRICT -577 501
3.
THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER HIRIYUR TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT -577 598
4.
THE PRESIDENT HOSAYALANADU GRAMA PANCHAYAT
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:12049 WP No. 2608 of 2025
JAVANAGONDANAHALLI HOBLI HIRIYUR TALUK, CHITRADURGA DIST- 577 511
5.
THE PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER HOSAYALANADU GRAMA PANCHAYAT JAVANAGONDANAHALLI HOBLI HIRIYUR TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT -577 511
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SHIVAPRABHU HIREMATH, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. N. PRAVEEN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3;
R4 & R5 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 12.11.2024 AT ANNEXURE-E, F AND REPRESENTATION DATED 13.11.2024 AT ANNEXURE-G SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER AND TO REINSTATE THE PETITIONER INTO SERVICE WITH ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:12049 WP No. 2608 of 2025
ORAL ORDER
In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged an
order of suspension from service dated 04.03.2024, issued by the 4th respondent.
2. It is stated that the respondents have thereafter terminated the petitioner from service which is challenged in Writ Petition No. 5061/2025. Hence, the W.P.No.2608/2025 does not survive for consideration and the same is disposed of.
3. However, the contention urged
in W.P.No. 2608/2025 is kept open to be considered in W.P.No.5061/2025.
Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE
JS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0