Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:41833 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7943 of 2025 Petitioner :- Narsingh Narayan Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Cooperative Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahesh Chandra Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the opposite party nos. 1 to 3 to paid the minimum pay scale and regularized the service of the petitioner from 27.01.1995 in the light of judgment reported 2010 (3) U.P. LEBC, Page 1823 Supreme Court, U.P. in case of Land Development Corporation and others Versus Mohd. Khursheed Anwar and others, reported case of Supreme court of India Civil appellate jurisdiction SLP 11086 of 2024, Jaggu Versus Union of India and others in the light of judgment Secretary, State of Karnataka Versus Uma Devi reported case Supreme Court 2006 (4)SCC and Government order dated 13.8.2016 issued by Secretary, Uttar Pradesh Sashan, Lucknow, and 2001 (2)POS 1185 UPZEDC in the interest of justice. ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the opposite parties no. 1 to 3 to decide the representation of the petitioner on dated 15.6.2025 as contained in Annexure no. 11 to this writ petition, in the interest of justice." 3. It is submitted that earlier petitioner alongwith two others had filed writ A No. 6074 of 2015 which was disposed of vide judgment and order dated 7th April, 2025 directing authorities concerned to consider petitioner's case. 4. It is submitted that in pursuance thereof opposite parties have passed order dated 20th May, 2025 reinstating petitioner on the post of Kurk Amin but aspects with regard to grant of minimum of pay scale and regularization as prayed for in this petition have not yet been decided. 5. Considering innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner and without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before opposite party No. 2 i.e. District Magistrate, District Sultanpur. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority in the light of judgment rendered by Supreme Court in the case of Sabha Shankar Dube v. Divisional Forest Officer reported in AIR 2019 SC 220, 6. With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 22.7.2025 prabhat Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench