GUFRAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
ABAIL/807/2025 · 2025-07-24
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152581 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152581 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:42546 Court No. - 14 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 807 of 2025 Applicant :- Gufran Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shailendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. Notice to respondent No.2 is dispensed with in view of the proposed order. 2.The present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.195 of 2021 under section 363 I.P.C., P.S. Boundi, district Bahraich. 3.A perusal of the record shows that offence under section 363 I.P.C. is punishable upto seven years. In the statement of the victim under section 164 CrPC, it is alleged that the accused applicant came to take away the victim. As per school record, the victim was 13 years old. It is not a case of false implication. No case for anticipatory bail is made out. 4.In view of the above, anticipatory bail is rejected. However, it is provided that in case the applicant files a regular bail application within two weeks from today, the same be decided expeditiously, strictly in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of
2021. Order Date :- 24.7.2025 kkb/ Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench