Subhash Chandra Gorain v. The State Of Jharkhand And Ors
WPC/7066/2017 · 2025-09-01
Deepak Roshan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15255 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15255 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:26384 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P (S). No. 7066 of 2017 ------- Subhash Chandra Gorain, s/o. Guri Ram Gorain, resident of village At.+P.O. Chiksia, P.S. Chas (M), District Bokaro.
……….. Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. The Chairman, Jharkhand State Electricity Board, P.O. & P.S. Kusai, Dist. Ranchi (Jharkhand).
3. The Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, P.O. & P.S. Kidwaipuri, Dist. Patna (Bihar).
4. The Additional Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, P.O. & P.S. Kidwaipuri, Dist. Patna (Bihar).
5. The Joint Secretary, Bihar State Power (Holding) Company Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, P.O. & P.S. Kidwaipuri, Dist. Patna (Bihar).
6. The Deputy Secretary, Bihar State Power (Holding) Company Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, P.O. & P.S. Kidwaipuri, Dist. Patna (Bihar).
7. The Managing Director-cum-Chief Engineer, Transmission Zone, Bihar State Power (Holding) Company Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, P.O. & P.S. Kidwaipuri, Dist. Patna (Bihar).
8. The Deputy Managing Director, Bihar State Power (Holding) Company Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, P.O. & P.S. Kidwaipuri, Dist. Patna (Bihar).
9. The Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited, Ranchi through Managing Director, Kusai Colony, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, Dist. Ranchi.
……….. Respondents
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
For the Petitioner : Mr. Samavesh Bhanj Deo, Advocate
Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Uttam Kr. Das, AC to GA-VI For the JUVNL :
Mr. M.K. Roy, Sr.S.C.
Mr. Chandan Tiwari, Advocate
For the BSPHCL : Mr. Manoj Tandon, Advocate
Ms. Neha Bhardwaj, Advocate
---- 20/ 01.09.2025 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant writ application may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate remedy.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents does not object to the same.
3. Having regard to the aforesaid submission, the instant writ application stands disposed of with the liberty as prayed for.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
Kunal