Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15255 (JHR)

Subhash Chandra Gorain v. The State Of Jharkhand And Ors

WPC/7066/2017 · 2025-09-01

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:26384 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P (S). No. 7066 of 2017 ------- Subhash Chandra Gorain, s/o. Guri Ram Gorain, resident of village At.+P.O. Chiksia, P.S. Chas (M), District Bokaro. ……….. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Chairman, Jharkhand State Electricity Board, P.O. & P.S. Kusai, Dist. Ranchi (Jharkhand). 3. The Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, P.O. & P.S. Kidwaipuri, Dist. Patna (Bihar). 4. The Additional Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, P.O. & P.S. Kidwaipuri, Dist. Patna (Bihar). 5. The Joint Secretary, Bihar State Power (Holding) Company Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, P.O. & P.S. Kidwaipuri, Dist. Patna (Bihar). 6. The Deputy Secretary, Bihar State Power (Holding) Company Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, P.O. & P.S. Kidwaipuri, Dist. Patna (Bihar). 7. The Managing Director-cum-Chief Engineer, Transmission Zone, Bihar State Power (Holding) Company Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, P.O. & P.S. Kidwaipuri, Dist. Patna (Bihar). 8. The Deputy Managing Director, Bihar State Power (Holding) Company Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, P.O. & P.S. Kidwaipuri, Dist. Patna (Bihar). 9. The Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited, Ranchi through Managing Director, Kusai Colony, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, Dist. Ranchi. ……….. Respondents ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner : Mr. Samavesh Bhanj Deo, Advocate Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Uttam Kr. Das, AC to GA-VI For the JUVNL : Mr. M.K. Roy, Sr.S.C. Mr. Chandan Tiwari, Advocate For the BSPHCL : Mr. Manoj Tandon, Advocate Ms. Neha Bhardwaj, Advocate ---- 20/ 01.09.2025 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant writ application may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate remedy. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents does not object to the same. 3. Having regard to the aforesaid submission, the instant writ application stands disposed of with the liberty as prayed for. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Kunal